Facing Extremism and International Challenges: A Realistic Middle East Peace
December 15, 2024 | Ehud Olmert and Nasser Al-Kidwa with Larry Mantle | Two Former Leaders – An Israeli and a Palestinian – Offer Path to Peace – Summary Prepared by JUDJ Team
In a recent America at a Crossroads discussion, former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and former Palestinian Foreign Minister Nasser Al-Kidwa tackled the pressing challenges standing in the way of Middle East peace. From rising extremism on both sides to public skepticism and wavering international support, the two leaders laid out a candid assessment of the barriers to peace—and the steps necessary to overcome them. With decades of political experience, Olmert and Al-Kidwa argued that while obstacles persist, the two-state solution remains the only viable path forward for Israelis and Palestinians.
Extremism: A Major Obstacle on Both Sides
One of the most significant barriers to peace, both leaders agreed, is the growing influence of extremists. Olmert criticized the far-right religious factions in Israel that hold disproportionate sway within the current government led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He highlighted the dangerous role of leaders like Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, whom he described as “Messianic fundamentalists” posing a real threat to Israel’s democratic and moral foundations.
On the Palestinian side, Al-Kidwa was equally forthright, acknowledging the damage caused by extremist groups like Hamas, whose influence in Gaza has undermined Palestinian unity and prolonged the conflict. However, Al-Kidwa also placed responsibility on external actors, including Israel and international powers, who have contributed to the political stagnation of the Palestinian Authority (PA). “We are fed up with fundamentalists on all sides,” he stated, calling for a united front against extremism in favor of coexistence.
Public Skepticism and Leadership Challenges
Another major challenge to peace is the lack of public trust, exacerbated by leadership failures on both sides. Following the October 7th attacks, Israeli public opinion has largely turned against the idea of a Palestinian state, with many citizens fearing that such a move would threaten Israel’s security. Olmert, however, remained optimistic, reminding viewers that public sentiment has shifted dramatically in the past under bold leadership. He pointed to historic examples, such as Israel’s peace deal with Egypt in 1979 and the Gaza disengagement in 2005, both of which initially faced widespread public resistance but ultimately succeeded.
On the Palestinian side, Al-Kidwa called for reform within the PA leadership, acknowledging its unpopularity under Mahmoud Abbas. As part of their proposal, he suggested the establishment of a transitional Palestinian Council linked to the PA but empowered to pave the way for democratic elections within 24 to 36 months. This, Al-Kidwa argued, would restore legitimacy to Palestinian governance and provide a clear negotiating partner for future peace talks.
The Role of the International Community
Olmert and Al-Kidwa emphasized that achieving peace requires not only strong local leadership but also the backing of the international community. While global powers have historically played a role in the conflict, their involvement has often been inconsistent. Al-Kidwa criticized certain international factions, including U.S. politicians with “Messianic visions,” who he argued prioritize their agendas over the well-being of Israelis and Palestinians alike.
Both leaders called for a renewed, balanced effort from international stakeholders. Olmert noted the importance of financial and diplomatic support, particularly for rebuilding Gaza and compensating displaced populations. Al-Kidwa added that external powers must encourage reasonable, realistic solutions rather than supporting hardline actors who prolong conflict.
The Path Forward: Realism and Courage
Despite these significant challenges, Olmert and Al-Kidwa’s message was one of hope. They insisted that extremism can be defeated, public opinion can shift, and leadership can rise to meet the moment—if both sides commit to realism and compromise. Their two-state solution proposal, which balances the 1967 borders with land swaps and a shared Jerusalem, offers a practical path toward coexistence.
As Al-Kidwa stated, “This is the only way forward if we are to get rid of this nightmare of continued war.” Echoing this sentiment, Olmert urged supporters of peace to stay hopeful and engaged, declaring, “Things can change, and we will work hard to change them.”
A Call to Action
Olmert and Al-Kidwa’s partnership is a rare example of political courage and cooperation in an era dominated by division and distrust. Their willingness to confront extremism, propose practical solutions, and call for international accountability offers a clear path forward for Israelis, Palestinians, and global stakeholders.
While the challenges are daunting, their message remains simple: peace is achievable, but it requires hard work, leadership, and the willingness to reject extremism in favor of coexistence. In a world often paralyzed by pessimism, their bold vision is a much-needed reminder that hope is not lost—and that a better future is within reach.
About America at a Crossroads
Since April 2020, America at a Crossroads has produced weekly virtual programs on topics related to the preservation of our democracy, voting rights, freedom of the press, and a wide array of civil rights, including abortion rights, free speech, and free press. America at a Crossroads is a project of Jews United for Democracy & Justice.